Tuesday, November 22, 2011

TinkerTool

I've just found a great little tool called TinkerTool that lets you set all sorts of obscure little settings on Mac OS X Lion all in one place... things like showing invisible files, etc. It doesn't change any component of the operating system, and it's easy to set everything back to previous conditions with just a keystroke.

Posted via email from Useful Stuff

Wednesday, November 9, 2011

We Do This Because...

I started Useful Stuff nearly three years ago as a sort of external memory device, to help me remember things I've figured out so I don't have to figure them out again a few months from now. Others have apparently found these things useful as well.

Recently, however, that original mission has expanded to include all sorts of musings, and I worry that people looking for how-to stuff won't be so interested in the theoretical rants, and vice versa. So Useful Stuff will go back to being a "know-how" blog, and I'll put all the "know-why" stuff on my new blog instead. It's entitled We Do This Because... because it looks more at the reasons behind things, rather than just the practicalities of getting stuff done.

I've just gone back and copied nearly three years of Useful Stuff's theoretical posts there... if you like posts like these, please consider following this We Do This Because...

Posted via email from Useful Stuff

How to Do a Visual Preference Survey

A Visual Preference Survey takes the pulse of a group of citizens concerning their preferences between various pairs of objects. We use them to test public preference for various languages (styles) of architecture, but they could also be used to test for many other object types as well.

To begin, select two sets of images... some use 50 pairs, others use 100, although the number isn't critical. Rather, there should be enough pairs to show trends, but not so many that they cause participant fatigue. You'll project each pair of images side-by-side, and participants will choose which one they prefer.

Each pair of images should show the same building type, but in two different languages of architecture. In other words, comparing a house to a gas station will almost always favor the house, so that result isn't useful. Also, a cottage often gets better ratings than a large house, so the size of the buildings should be similar. Also, you should control for image externalities. In other words, if one image has a blue sky, the other should as well, as a blue-sky image almost always rates higher than one taken on a grey and cloudy day. The bottom line is that you want to make the architecture the primary difference between the images, so that the results are meaningful.

Participants are given a simple scorecard, and are instructed to check the right box if they prefer the right image, or the left box if they prefer the left image. Each image pair is numbered, as are the checkboxes on the scorecards. When the survey is complete, the results are tallied in a database where they can be analyzed.

The results are often striking. Whereas we as architects can debate endlessly over architecture, the non-architects are usually quite decisive. It's really a technique we should use more often, IMO.

Posted via email from Useful Stuff